Arum, hear what experts said about aligning the reward system and open science goals

The recording of the webinar “Open science and the reward system” is available now

	View in a browser

Dear Arum,

Why should we reform the reward system for research? What would that reform look like? How would it impact open science initiatives?

These are some of the questions answered by the experts during the event Open science and the reward system: how can they be aligned? You can now listen the full recording of this fascinating discussion.

Listen to the webinar >

Topics of discussion included:

Societal impact take years to show. How can this impact be traced and rewarded?
Who could lead the move away from the traditional approach to publishing and funding models?
Would open peer review promote collaboration and be rewardable?
Could early-career researchers lead the change to a broader, more representative reward system?

The participants of experts on open science, early-career experiences and career assessment included:


Moniek Tromp , Vice Chair, Selection Committee of Young Academy of Europe, and Chair of Materials Chemistry of the University of Groningen	Matthew DiFranco, Chief Scientific Officer at ImageBiopsy Lab


Véronique De Herde, PhD Candidate at UCLouvain; Open Science Ambassador for Eurodoc	Andrew Plume, Senior Director of Research Evaluation at Elsevier; Chair of the ICSR Advisory Board

Hear what they had to say >

This message has been sent to arum98@gmail.com from Elsevier Communications on behalf of Elsevier Scopus.
Unsubscribe or change your communication preferences
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V.. All rights reserved. | Elsevier Privacy Policy
Elsevier B.V. Registered Office: Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Reg. No. 33158992 – Netherlands. VAT No. NL 005033019B01.